Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, Wm. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition

Mason A. Carpenter

School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 975 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USAmcarpenter{at}bus.wisc.edu

Marta A. Geletkanycz

Carroll School of Management, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USAgeletkan{at}bc.edu

Wm. Gerard Sanders

The Marriott School, Brigham Young University, 788 TNRB, Provo, UT 84602, USAgsanders{at}byu.edu

This study reviews recent research building on Hambrick and Mason’s [Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206] upper echelons (UE) perspective with the aim of identifying challenges and opportunities for future UE-based organizations research. Our review highlights a number of central facets of the UE perspective: It is at once a theoretical framework predicting that organizations will be a reflection of their top management teams and a methodology that relies on executive demography as a measurement proxy for underlying individual and group cognitions and behaviors. In proposing new research directions, we challenge organizations researchers to (1) reconsider the universality of the top management team (TMT) construct, (2) carefully explore the practical and theoretical meaning of TMT demographic characteristics vis-à-vis the deeper constructs they are presumed to proxy, (3) integrate other determinants of managerial cognition and behavior into UE theorizing, and (4) revisit the roles of causality and intertemporal dynamics among the antecedents, consequences, and composition of top management teams.

References

  • Allison, P. 1978. Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43: 865–880.[CrossRef]
  • Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 123–148.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Amason, A. C., & Mooney, A. C. 1999. The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4): 340–359.
  • Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. G. 1997. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4): 495–601.[Abstract]
  • Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. 1999. The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 83–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107–124.
  • Bergh, D. D. 2001. Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure. Journal of Management, 27: 603–622.[Abstract]
  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 1169–1208.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bigley, G., & Wiersema, M. 2002. New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences use of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 707–729.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boeker, W.1997.Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 152–170.
  • Boeker, W. 1997. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 213–236.[CrossRef]
  • Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34: 816–835.[Web of Science]
  • Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 875–893.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Cannella, A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1993. Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 137–152.
  • Cannella, A., & Lubatkin, M. 1993. Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 763–794.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Cannella, A., & Shen, W. 2001. So close and yet so far: Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 252–271.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carpenter, M. A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 275–284.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 533–546.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. 2003. Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategic intent: Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 803–820.[CrossRef]
  • Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. 2002. Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 367–375.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. 2001. Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 493–512.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001. The impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639–660.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2003. Strategic human resource practice, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creative organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 720–731.
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Daily, C., Certo, T., & Dalton, D. 2000. International experience in the executive suite: The path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 515–523.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • D’Aveni, R. 1990. Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organization Science, 1: 121–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • D’Aveni, R., & Kesner, I. 1993. Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: A study of elite social networks and target firm cooperation during takeovers. Organization Science, 4: 123–151.
  • Delery, J., & Doty, H. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 802–835.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Denis, J., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. 2001. The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 809–837.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–576.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737–770.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. 1997. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2): 42–62.[Web of Science]
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 504–529.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7: 136–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288–307.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ferrier, W. J. 2001. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 858–877.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ferrier, W. J., & Lyon, D. in press. Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Managerial and Decision Economics.
  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484–503.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis: West Publishing.
  • Geletkanycz, M. A. 1997. The salience of ’culture’s consequences’: The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 615–634.[CrossRef]
  • Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S. 2001. Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27: 3–21.[Abstract]
  • Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 654–681.[CrossRef]
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gordon, S. S., Stewart, W. H., Jr., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. 2000. Convergence versus strategic reorientation: The antecedents of fast-paced organizational change. Journal of Management, 26: 911–946.[Abstract]
  • Greening, D., & Johnson, R. 1997. Managing industrial and organization crises. Business and Society, 36: 334–361.
  • Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. 1993. Top-management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 844–863.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the "team" label. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: Vol. 16. 171–213. Beverly Hill: JAI Press.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. 2004. CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal.
  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659–684.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. in press. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. 1991. Seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16: 719–743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M., & Fredrickson, J. 1993. Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401–418.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.
  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. 1998. Beyond relational demography. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 96–107.
  • Hayward, M., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103–127.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. 2002. CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 551–569.
  • Hoffman, R., & Hegarty, W. 1993. Top management influence on innovations: Effect of executive characteristics and social culture. Journal of Management, 19: 549–574.[Abstract]
  • Hofstede, G. 1992. Cultural dimensions in people management: The socialization perspective. In V. Pucik, N. Tichy, & C. Barnett (Eds.), Globalizing management: Creating and leading the competitive organization: 139–158. New York: Wiley.
  • Iaquinto, A. L., & Fredrickson, J. W. 1997. Top management team agreement about the strategic decision process: A test of some of its determinants and consequences. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 63–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. 2000. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106: 387–424.[CrossRef]
  • Jackson, S. 1992. Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff, & J. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: 345–382. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. 2004. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural differences shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 507–524.[CrossRef]
  • Keck, S. L. 1997. Top management team structure: Differential effects by environment context. Organization Science, 8(2): 143–156.
  • Ketchen, D. 2002. Some candid thoughts on the publication process. Journal of Management, 28: 585–590.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., et al. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 445–465.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kor, Y. T. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14: 707–719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Krishnan, H. A., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. 1997. Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management Journal, 18: 361–374.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8: 1–22.
  • McDonald, M., & Westphal, J. D. 2003. Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 1–32.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Miller, D. 1991. Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and the environment. Management Science, 1: 34–54.
  • Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. New York: Erlbaum.
  • Murray, A. I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 125–141.
  • Norburn, D. 1989. The chief executive: A breed apart. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 1–15.
  • Papadakis, V. M., & Barwise, P. 2002. How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision-making? British Journal of Management, 13: 83–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Peng, M., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 486–501.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. 2003. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 795–808.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163–182.
  • Pitcher, P., & Smith, A. D. 2001. Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12: 1–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., & Dess, G. G. 1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25: 935–953.[Abstract]
  • Reuber, R., & Fischer, E. 1997. The influence of the management team’s international experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. Journal of International Business, 28: 807–825.
  • Richard, O., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. 2004. Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 255–266.[Web of Science]
  • Sambharya, R. B. 1996. Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of U.S. multinational companies. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 739–746.[CrossRef]
  • Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 158–178.[CrossRef]
  • Sarason, Y. 1995. A model of organizational transformation: The incorporation of organizational identity into a structuration theory framework. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 47–51.
  • Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6): 662–673.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. in press. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal.
  • Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M.-J. 1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 60–86.
  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J., Sims, H., O’Bannon, D., & Scully, J. 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412–438.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Strandholm, K., Kumar, K., & Subramanian, R. 2004. Examining the interrelationships among perceived environmental change, strategic response, managerial characteristics, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 57: 58–68.[CrossRef]
  • Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26: 1157–1177.[Abstract]
  • Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. 1996. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Science, 42: 939–953.
  • Vancil, R. 1987. A look at CEO succession. Harvard Business Review, 65(2): 107–118.
  • West, C. T., & Schwenk, C. R. 1996. Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding non-findings. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 571–576.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. 1996. Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6): 680–693.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Westphal, J., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Who directs strategic change: Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 1113–1138.[CrossRef]
  • Westphal, J., & Milton, L. 2000. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 366–401.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Wiersema, M., & Bird, A. 1993. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 996–1025.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77–140.

Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, 749-778 (2004)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
F. Damanpour and M. Schneider
Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 495 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
B. Wooldridge, T. Schmid, and S. W. Floyd
The Middle Management Perspective on Strategy Process: Contributions, Synthesis, and Future Research
Journal of Management, December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1190 - 1221.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
H.-C. Lin and C.-T. Shih
How Executive SHRM System Links to Firm Performance: The Perspectives of Upper Echelon and Competitive Dynamics{dagger}
Journal of Management, October 1, 2008; 34(5): 853 - 881.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
K. D. Brouthers and J.-F. Hennart
Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 395 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
A. M. L. Raes, U. Glunk, M. G. Heijltjes, and R. A. Roe
Top Management Team and Middle Managers: Making Sense of Leadership
Small Group Research, June 1, 2007; 38(3): 360 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
B. J. Olson, S. Parayitam, and Yongjian Bao
Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, Conflict, and Trust on Decision Outcomes
Journal of Management, April 1, 2007; 33(2): 196 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
L. A. Arendt, R. L. Priem, and H. A. Ndofor
A CEO-Adviser Model of Strategic Decision Making
Journal of Management, October 1, 2005; 31(5): 680 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, Wm. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?