Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Measures articles of interest from JOM

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0149206308330556v1
35/3/537    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whetten, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions

David A. Whetten

Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, dwhetten{at}byu.edu

Teppo Felin

Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT

Brayden G. King

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

The borrowing and application of concepts and theories from underlying disciplines, such as psychology and sociology, is commonplace in organization theory. This article critically reviews this practice in organizational research. It discusses the borrowing of theoretical perspectives across vertical (cross-level) and horizontal (cross-context) boundaries and makes an associated distinction between theories in organizations and theories of organizations. It also explicates several unintended consequences and metatheoretical challenges associated with theory borrowing and highlights the legitimate reasons and ways for borrowing theories. By way of example, this article reviews how theories and concepts have been borrowed and applied in organizational research from two different literatures: individual identity and social movements. Overall, it is argued that treating organizations as social actors is the key to appropriate horizontal and vertical theory borrowing in organizational studies, in that it highlights the distinctive features of the organizational social form and organizational social context.

Key Words: organization theory • concept and theory borrowing • interdisciplinary research

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Journal of Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 537-563 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0149206308330556


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
T. Felin
Editor's Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2010; 19(1): 33 - 33.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
S. Albert and M. H. Anderson
Conceptual Translation: A Metatheoretical Program for the Construction, Critique, and Integration of Theory
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2010; 19(1): 34 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
T. N. Bauer
The Journal of Management Review Issue: Celebrating 35 Years
Journal of Management, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 1297 - 1301.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. Highhouse, M. E. Brooks, and G. Gregarus
An Organizational Impression Management Perspective on the Formation of Corporate Reputations
Journal of Management, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 1481 - 1493.
[Abstract] [PDF]