|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Antecedents of Impression Management Use and Effectiveness in a Structured Interview
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Department of Management, Florida State University, Room 361 RBB, 821 Academic Way, P.O. Box 3061110, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110, cvanidde{at}fsu.edu
Lynn A. McFarland
Department of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-1355
Patrick H. Raymark
Department of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-1355
The authors examine personality variables and interview format as potential antecedents of impression management (IM) behaviors in simulated selection interviews. The means by which these variables affect ratings of interview performance is also investigated. The altruism facet of agreeableness predicted defensive IM behaviors, the vulnerability facet of emotional stability predicted self- and other-focused behaviors, and interview format (behavior description vs. situational questions) predicted self-focused and defensive behaviors. Consistent with theory and research on situational strength, antecedent—IM relations were consistently weaker in a strong situation in which interviewees had an incentive to manage their impressions. There was also evidence that IM partially mediated the effects of personality and interview format on interview performance in the weak situation.
Key Words: employment interview employee selection impression management five-factor model of personality
Journal of Management, Vol. 33, No. 5,
752-773 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0149206307305563

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Bolino, K. M. Kacmar, W. H. Turnley, and J. B. Gilstrap
A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors
Journal of Management,
December 1, 2008;
34(6):
1080 - 1109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|