Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hitt, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Constrains or Facilitates Divestitures of Formerly Acquired Firms? The Effects of Organizational Inertia

Katsuhiko Shimizu

Department of Management, University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 North Loop 1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249-0634, kshimizu{at}utsa.edu

Michael A. Hitt

Department of Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4221

This study examined behavioral explanations for the divestitures of formerly acquired units, particularly organizational inertia. It was argued that characteristics of parent firms and divested units reduce the likelihood of divesting a poorly performing unit. Conversely, it was also argued that change of key personnel and effective governance mechanisms increase the likelihood of such divestitures. Importantly, the results show that with age and size combined, appointment of new outside directors and divestiture experience (among other variables) moderated the effects on the likelihood of firms divesting units they had previously acquired. Implications for future theory development and management practice are also discussed.

Key Words: mergers and acquisitions • divestiture • organizational inertia • case control design

Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No. 1, 50-72 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0149206304271381


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J. O'Brien and T. Folta
Sunk costs, uncertainty and market exit: A real options perspective
Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2009; 18(5): 807 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
H. G. Barkema and M. Schijven
How Do Firms Learn to Make Acquisitions? A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 594 - 634.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. Brauer
What Have We Acquired and What Should We Acquire in Divestiture Research? A Review and Research Agenda
Journal of Management, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 751 - 785.
[Abstract] [PDF]