This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carpenter, M. A. Articles by Sanders, Wm. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition

School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 975 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USAmcarpenter{at}bus.wisc.edu

Marta A. Geletkanycz

Carroll School of Management, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USAgeletkan{at}bc.edu

Wm. Gerard Sanders

The Marriott School, Brigham Young University, 788 TNRB, Provo, UT 84602, USAgsanders{at}byu.edu

This study reviews recent research building on Hambrick and Mason’s [Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206] upper echelons (UE) perspective with the aim of identifying challenges and opportunities for future UE-based organizations research. Our review highlights a number of central facets of the UE perspective: It is at once a theoretical framework predicting that organizations will be a reflection of their top management teams and a methodology that relies on executive demography as a measurement proxy for underlying individual and group cognitions and behaviors. In proposing new research directions, we challenge organizations researchers to (1) reconsider the universality of the top management team (TMT) construct, (2) carefully explore the practical and theoretical meaning of TMT demographic characteristics vis-à-vis the deeper constructs they are presumed to proxy, (3) integrate other determinants of managerial cognition and behavior into UE theorizing, and (4) revisit the roles of causality and intertemporal dynamics among the antecedents, consequences, and composition of top management teams.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. D. Brouthers and J.-F. Hennart Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 395 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. L. Raes, U. Glunk, M. G. Heijltjes, and R. A. Roe Top Management Team and Middle Managers: Making Sense of Leadership Small Group Research, June 1, 2007; 38(3): 360 - 386. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Olson, S. Parayitam, and Yongjian Bao Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, Conflict, and Trust on Decision Outcomes Journal of Management, April 1, 2007; 33(2): 196 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Arendt, R. L. Priem, and H. A. Ndofor A CEO-Adviser Model of Strategic Decision Making Journal of Management, October 1, 2005; 31(5): 680 - 699. [Abstract] [PDF]