Journal of Management

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript electronically

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kriska, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 5, 641-661 (2003)
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00030-8

Impression Management Use and Effectiveness Across Assessment Methods

Lynn A. McFarland

Department of Psychology, George Mason University, MSN 3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA

Ann Marie Ryan

Michigan State University, 129 Psychology Research Building, East Lansing, MI 48824-1117, USA

S. David Kriska

City of Columbus, 50 West Gay Street, Columbus, OH 43215, USA

Considerable research has focused on candidate impression management (IM) use in unstructured interviews. However, little research has explored candidate IM use in other, frequently used assessment methods. This study examines the extent to which candidates, under consideration for a promotion, use verbal IM tactics in two types of structured individual assessment methods: a situational interview and a role-play. Based on a cybernetic model of IM, we predicted that IM use and effectiveness would vary across the two methods. Thus, this study examines the consistency of IM use across assessment methods; an issue that has not previously been explored. As expected, the situational interview resulted in greater use of candidate IM tactics. Additionally, other-focused tactics were used significantly more frequently than self-focused tactics in both assessment methods. IM use in the situational interview predicted assessor ratings and final promotion scores, while IM use in the role-play did not. Overall, these results provide indirect support for the cybernetic model of IM.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
C. H. Van Iddekinge, L. A. McFarland, and P. H. Raymark
Antecedents of Impression Management Use and Effectiveness in a Structured Interview{dagger}
Journal of Management, October 1, 2007; 33(5): 752 - 773.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. E. Ployhart
Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities
Journal of Management, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 868 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]