This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Short, J. C. Articles by Palmer, T. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Role of Sampling in Strategic Management Research on Performance: A Two-Study Analysis

School of Business Administration, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA, jeremys{at}sba.pdx.edu

David J. Ketchen, Jr.

College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA, dketchen{at}garnet.acns.fsu.edu

Timothy B. Palmer

Department of Management, Haworth College of Business, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA, timothy.palmer{at}wmich.edu

Strategic management researchers often note the inability of many phenomena to consistently explain organizational performance. Using a two-study format, we examine the possibility that sampling practices may contribute to this inability. We chronicle sampling practices within 437 studies investigating the determinants of organizational performance published between 1980 and 1999 in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Management, Organization Science, and Strategic Management Journal. Our results reveal that fewer than one in five studies rely on a random sample and that researchers offer little a priori acknowledgement of sample limitations. Although the first study suggests that sampling issues have been problematic, it cannot offer direct evidence. Thus, in the second study, we examine the effect of sample selection on empirical results by testing one popular relationship from the strategy literature (chief executive officer duality and performance) using four different samples. Whereas a stratified random sample offers some evidence of a positive relationship, a purposive sample detects a negative relationship and an available sample and simple random sample detect no relationship. Taken together, the studies suggest that sampling practices must improve if strategic management is to approach its objective of explaining performance. Accordingly, several exemplar studies are described and recommendations are offered to guide future sampling practices.

Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, 363-385 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014920630202800306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Ketchen Jr, B. K. Boyd, and D. D. Bergh Research Methodology in Strategic Management: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 643 - 658. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Beltran-Martin, V. Roca-Puig, A. Escrig-Tena, and J. C. Bou-Llusar Human Resource Flexibility as a Mediating Variable Between High Performance Work Systems and Performance Journal of Management, October 1, 2008; 34(5): 1009 - 1044. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Short, D. J. Ketchen Jr., N. Bennett, and M. du Toit An Examination of Firm, Industry, and Time Effects on Performance Using Random Coefficients Modeling Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 259 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Rau The Influence of Relationship Conflict and Trust on the Transactive Memory: Performance Relation in Top Management Teams Small Group Research, December 1, 2005; 36(6): 746 - 771. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Kieser Editor's Introduction Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2005; 14(3): 268 - 270. [PDF]

				T. Saxton and M. Dollinger Target Reputation and Appropriability: Picking and Deploying Resources in Acquisitions Journal of Management, February 1, 2004; 30(1): 123 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]