Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antonioni, D.
Right arrow Articles by Park, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings

David Antonioni

University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Business–Executive Education, 601 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53715-1035, USA

Heejoon Park

University of Wisconsin–Madison, Industrial Relations Research Institute, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA

We investigated whether rater affect has a similar effect on the leniency of ratings from three of the sources of 360-degree feedback (downward, upward, and peer) and whether there is an interaction between a rater’s affect and the time he or she has spent observing the ratee. The findings indicate that the influence of rater affect on the leniency of ratings was significantly greater in upward and peer feedback than in downward feedback and that the influence increased as raters’ observation time increased.

Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, 479-495 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/014920630102700405
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
S. Moss
Cultivating the Regulatory Focus of Followers to Amplify Their Sensitivity to Transformational Leadership
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2009; 15(3): 241 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
N. P. Mero, R. M. Guidice, and A. L. Brownlee
Accountability in a Performance Appraisal Context: The Effect of Audience and Form of Accounting on Rater Response and Behavior
Journal of Management, April 1, 2007; 33(2): 223 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
S. Taggar and T. C. Brown
Interpersonal Affect and Peer Rating Bias in Teams
Small Group Research, February 1, 2006; 37(1): 86 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
P. A. Bamberger, I. Erev, M. Kimmel, and T. Oref-Chen
Peer Assessment, Individual Performance, and Contribution to Group Processes: The Impact of Rater Anonymity
Group Organization Management, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 344 - 377.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
P. E. Levy and J. R. Williams
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 881 - 905.
[Abstract] [PDF]