This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (62) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Breaugh, J. A. Articles by Starke, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Research on Employee Recruitment: So Many Studies, So Many Remaining Questions

Mary Starke

University of Missouri–St. Louis

Over the last thirty years, the amount of research on recruitment topics has increased dramatically. Despite this increase, recent reviews of the recruitment literature often have had a somewhat pessimistic tone. Reviewers have concluded that we still do not know a great deal about why recruitment activities have the effects they do. In particular, recent reviews have criticized many of the studies conducted for being poorly designed, narrow in focus, and not grounded in theory. We believe that many of these criticisms are legitimate. We also believe that, in order for future studies to result in a better understanding of the recruitment process, such studies need to be designed with an appreciation of the complexity of the recruitment process (i.e., the number of variables involved and the nature of their relationships). In this regard, we offer an organizing framework of the recruitment process. In introducing this framework, we draw upon theories from a variety of research domains and give considerable attention to process variables (e.g., aplicant attention, message credibility, applicant self-insight) that mediate the relationships between recruitment activities (e.g., recruiter behavior) and recruitment outcomes (e.g., the number of applications generated). Having introduced an organizing framework, we selectively review recruitment research, giving particular attention to the topics of recruitment sources, recruiters, and realistic job previews. This review makes apparent a number of important issues that recruitment research has yet to address.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Ployhart Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities Journal of Management, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 868 - 897. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Liu and S. M. Johnson New Teachers' Experiences of Hiring: Late, Rushed, and Information-Poor Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 2006; 42(3): 324 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. H. Ehrhart and J. C. Ziegert Why Are Individuals Attracted to Organizations? Journal of Management, December 1, 2005; 31(6): 901 - 919. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. T. Cober, D. J. Brown, L. M. Keeping, and P. E. Levy Recruitment on the Net: How Do Organizational Web Site Characteristics Influence Journal of Management, October 1, 2004; 30(5): 623 - 646. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. B. Backhaus An Exploration of Corporate Recruitment Descriptions on Monster.com Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2004; 41(2): 115 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Carlson and M. L. Connerley The Staffing Cycles Framework: Viewing Staffing as a System of Decision Events Journal of Management, February 1, 2003; 29(1): 51 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Ryan and R. E. Ployhart Applicants' Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future Journal of Management, June 1, 2000; 26(3): 565 - 606. [Abstract] [PDF]