Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stark, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Interdependence and Preference for Group Work: Main and Congruence Effects on the Satisfaction and Performance of Group Members

Jason D. Shaw

Michelle K. Duffy

University of Kentucky

Eric M. Stark

Washington and Jefferson College

This study examined the direct and interactive relationships of interdependence (task and reward) and preference for group work on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Hypotheses were tested among a sample of task-performing group members over a four-month period (N’s = 328–432). Consistent with a "community of fate" perspective, hierarchical regressions revealed that interdependence (task and reward) and preference for group work were positively related to group-member satisfaction. Consistent with "supplies-values fit" framework, the interaction of task interdependence and preference for group work was significantly related to group-member performance. Implications for the design of group tasks, the effects of group-member preferences, and the prediction of individual satisfaction and performance in group contexts are discussed.

Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, 259-279 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/014920630002600205
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
E. M. Stark, J. D. Shaw, and M. K. Duffy
Preference for Group Work, Winning Orientation, and Social Loafing Behavior in Groups
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2007; 32(6): 699 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
M. K. Duffy and W. J. Ferrier
Birds of a Feather...?: How Supervisor-Subordinate Dissimilarity Moderates the Influence of Supervisor Behaviors on Workplace Attitudes
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2003; 28(2): 217 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
P. M. Wright and W. R. Boswell
Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research
Journal of Management, June 1, 2002; 28(3): 247 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
C. M. Mason and M. A. Griffin
Grouptask Satisfaction: Applying the Construct of Job Satisfaction to Groups
Small Group Research, June 1, 2002; 33(3): 271 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]