Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ketchen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strategic Responses to Poor Organizational Performance: A Test of Competing Perspectives

David J. Ketchen, Jr.

Florida State University

Timothy B. Palmer

Western Michigan University

Two widely cited, yet disparate, theoretical views of the relationship between poor performance and subsequent organizational action appear in organizational research. The behavioral theory of the firm posits that poor performing organizations will make strategic changes in, for example, the products and services they offer. In contrast, the threat-rigidity perspective predicts rather conservative responses; poor performers are expected to rely on previous actions to reverse their poor outcomes. We examined these competing predictions using data from a regional sample of hospitals. The results offer support for the behavioral theory of the firm and no support for threat-rigidity. We derive several implications from these findings in an effort to guide future research.

Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 5, 683-706 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639902500504


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
G. Labianca, J. F. Fairbank, G. Andrevski, and M. Parzen
Striving toward the future: aspiration--performance discrepancies and planned organizational change
Strategic Organization, November 1, 2009; 7(4): 433 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. C. Short, G. T. Payne, and D. J. Ketchen Jr.
Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges
Journal of Management, December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1053 - 1079.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. P. Wright
Eliciting Cognitions of Strategizing Using Advanced Repertory Grids in a World Constructed and Reconstructed
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 753 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
Heli Wang and Jiatao Li
Untangling the Effects of Overexploration and Overexploitation on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism{dagger}
Journal of Management, October 1, 2008; 34(5): 925 - 951.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
H. R. Greve
'Exploration and exploitation in product innovation'
Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 945 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. C. Short, D. J. Ketchen Jr., N. Bennett, and M. du Toit
An Examination of Firm, Industry, and Time Effects on Performance Using Random Coefficients Modeling
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 259 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
J. Griffith
What Do the Soldiers Say?: Needed Ingredients for Determining Unit Readiness
Armed Forces & Society, April 1, 2006; 32(3): 367 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
T. C. Reeves, E. W. Ford, W. J. Duncan, and P. M. Ginter
Communication clarity in strategic management data sources
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2005; 3(3): 243 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. J. Ketchen Jr., C. C. Snow, and V. L. Hoover
Research on Competitive Dynamics: Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 779 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
H. Mitsuhashi and H. R. Greve
Powerful and Free: Intraorganizational Power and the Dynamics of Corporate Strategy
Strategic Organization, May 1, 2004; 2(2): 107 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. L. Morrow Jr., R. A. Johnson, and L. W. Busenitz
The Effects of Cost and Asset Retrenchment on Firm Performance: The Overlooked Role of a Firm's Competitive Environment
Journal of Management, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 189 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]