This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (81) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hoskisson, R. E. Articles by Yiu, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum

University of Oklahoma

Michael A. Hitt

Texas A & M University

William P. Wan

Daphne Yiu

University of Oklahoma

The development of the field of strategic management within the last two decades has been dramatic. While its roots have been in a more applied area, often referred to as business policy, the current field of strategic management is strongly theory based, with substantial empirical research, and is eclectic in nature. This review of the development of the field and its current position examines the field’s early development and the primary theoretical and methodological bases through its history. Early developments include Chandler’s (1962) Strategy and Structure and Ansoff’s (1965) Corporate Strategy. These early works took on a contingency perspective (fit between strategy and structure) and a resource-based framework emphasizing internal strengths and weaknesses. Perhaps, one of the more significant contributions to the development of strategic management came from industrial organization (IO) economics, specifically the work of Michael Porter. The structure-conduct-performance framework and the notion of strategic groups, as well as providing a foundation for research on competitive dynamics, are flourishing currently. The IO paradigm also brought econometric tools to the research on strategic management. Building on the IO economics framework, the organizational economics perspective contributed transaction costs economics and agency theory to strategic management. More recent theoretical contributions focus on the resource-based view of the firm. While it has its roots in Edith Penrose’s work in the late 1950s, the resource-based view was largely introduced to the field of strategic management in the 1980s and became a dominant framework in the 1990s. Based on the resource-based view or developing concurrently were research on strategic leadership, strategic decision theory (process research) and knowledge-based view of the firm. The research methodologies are becoming increasingly sophisticated and now frequently combine both quantitative and qualitative approaches and unique and new statistical tools. Finally, this review examines the future directions, both in terms of theory and methodologies, as the study of strategic management evolves.

Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, 417-456 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639902500307


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. P. Wright Eliciting Cognitions of Strategizing Using Advanced Repertory Grids in a World Constructed and Reconstructed Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 753 - 769. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Lockett, R. P. O'Shea, and M. Wright The Development of the Resource-based View: Reflections from Birger Wernerfelt 1 Organization Studies, August 1, 2008; 29(8-9): 1125 - 1141. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Armstrong and K. Shimizu A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm{dagger} Journal of Management, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 959 - 986. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. Dentchev Corporate Social Performance: Business Rationale, Competitiveness Threats, and Management Challenges Business Society, March 1, 2007; 46(1): 104 - 116. [PDF]

				J. T. Mahoney and A. M. McGahan The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization Strategic Organization, February 1, 2007; 5(1): 79 - 99. [PDF]

				Y. R. Choi and D. A. Shepherd Entrepreneurs' Decisions to Exploit Opportunities Journal of Management, June 1, 2004; 30(3): 377 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Singh, S. H. Ang, and S. M. Leong Increasing Replication for Knowledge Accumulation in Strategy Research Journal of Management, August 1, 2003; 29(4): 533 - 549. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. X. Li and W. B. Berta The Ties that Bind: Strategic Actions and Status Structure in the US Investment Banking Industry Organization Studies, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 339 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Barney, M. Wright, and D. J. Ketchen Jr. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 Journal of Management, December 1, 2001; 27(6): 625 - 641. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Lockett and S. Thompson The resource-based view and economics Journal of Management, December 1, 2001; 27(6): 723 - 754. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Peng The resource-based view and international business Journal of Management, December 1, 2001; 27(6): 803 - 829. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. T. Rothaermel and S. Sugiyama Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com Journal of Management, June 1, 2001; 27(3): 297 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Deephouse Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories Journal of Management, December 1, 2000; 26(6): 1091 - 1112. [Abstract] [PDF]