Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gavin, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations

David A. Hofmann

Texas A & M University

Mark B. Gavin

Oklahoma State University

Organizational researchers are increasingly interested in model ing the multilevel nature of organizational data. Although most organi zational researchers have chosen to investigate these models using traditional Ordinary Least Squares approaches, hierarchical linear models (i.e., random coefficient models) recently have been receiving increased attention. One of the key questions in using hierarchical linear models is how a researcher chooses to scale the Level-1 indepen dent variables (e.g., raw metric, grand mean centering, group mean centering), because it directly influences the interpretation of both the level-1 and level-2 parameters. Several scaling options are reviewed and discussed in light of four paradigms of multilevellcross-level research in organizational science: incremental (i.e., group variables add incremental prediction to individual level outcomes over and above individual level predictors), mediational (i.e., the influence of group level variables on individual outcomes are mediated by individual perceptions), moderational (i.e., the relationship between two individ ual level variables is moderated by a group level variable), and sepa rate (i.e., separate within group and between group models). The paper concludes with modeling recommendations for each of these paradigms and discusses the importance of matching the paradigm under which one is operating to the appropriate modeling strategy.

Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 5, 623-641 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639802400504


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Zhang, M. J. Zyphur, and K. J. Preacher
Testing Multilevel Mediation Using Hierarchical Linear Models: Problems and Solutions
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 695 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
P.-C. Wu and S. Chaturvedi
The Role of Procedural Justice and Power Distance in the Relationship Between High Performance Work Systems and Employee Attitudes: A Multilevel Perspective
Journal of Management, October 1, 2009; 35(5): 1228 - 1247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
Zhaoli Song, M. A. Uy, Shuhua Zhang, and Kan Shi
Daily job search and psychological distress: Evidence from China
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1171 - 1197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. M. LaHuis and M. W. Ferguson
The Accuracy of Significance Tests for Slope Variance Components in Multilevel Random Coefficient Models
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2009; 12(3): 418 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
A. Craddock
Day Reporting Center Completion: Comparison of Individual and Multilevel Models
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2009; 55(1): 105 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
Tae Young Han and K. J. Williams
Multilevel Investigation of Adaptive Performance: Individual- and Team-Level Relationships
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 657 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
A. M. Watkins
Effects of Community, School, and Student Factors on School-Based Weapon Carrying
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2008; 6(4): 386 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. L. Gruys, S. M. Stewart, J. Goodstein, M. N. Bing, and A. C. Wicks
Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination
Journal of Management, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 806 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. M. Riordan and J. H. Wayne
A Review and Examination of Demographic Similarity Measures Used to Assess Relational Demography Within Groups
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 562 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Hee Sun Park
The Effects of Shared Cognition on Group Satisfaction and Performance: Politeness and Efficiency in Group Interaction
Communication Research, February 1, 2008; 35(1): 88 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. M. B. Thatcher and L. L. Greer
Does It Really Matter If You Recognize Who I Am? The Implications of Identity Comprehension for Individuals in Work Teams{dagger}
Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Riketta and C. A. Sacramento
`They Cooperate With Us, So They Are Like Me': Perceived Intergroup Relationship Moderates Projection from Self to Outgroups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2008; 11(1): 115 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
R. H. Heck
Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Quality as an Organizational Property of Schools and Students' Achievement and Growth Rates
Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2007; 43(4): 399 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
M. W.-L. Cheung
Comparison of Methods of Handling Missing Time-Invariant Covariates in Latent Growth Models Under the Assumption of Missing Completely at Random
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 609 - 634.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
C. E. Beaudoin
HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of message frames and their social determinants
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2007; 22(3): 198 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
IJ. H. van Emmerik, M. C. Euwema, and A. B. Bakker
Threats of Workplace Violence and the Buffering Effect of Social Support
Group Organization Management, April 1, 2007; 32(2): 152 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
K. S. Lyness and M. Brumit Kropf
Cultural Values and Potential Nonresponse Bias: A Multilevel Examination of Cross-National Differences in Mail Survey Response Rates
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 210 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. A. Scott and T. A. Judge
Insomnia, Emotions, and Job Satisfaction: A Multilevel Study
Journal of Management, October 1, 2006; 32(5): 622 - 645.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
O. Paccagnella
Centering or Not Centering in Multilevel Models? The Role of the Group Mean and the Assessment of Group Effects
Eval Rev, February 1, 2006; 30(1): 66 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, R. A. Jaworski, and N. Bennett
Social Loafing: A Field Investigation
Journal of Management, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 285 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. J. Beal and H. M. Weiss
Methods of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Organizational Research
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2003; 6(4): 440 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
P. D. Bliese and R. E. Ployhart
Growth Modeling Using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and Illustrations
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 362 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
M. L. Davison, N. Kwak, Y. S. Seo, and J. Choi
Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Moderator Effects: Person-by-Organization Interactions
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2002; 5(3): 231 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
E. M. Whitener
Do "high commitment" human resource practices affect employee commitment?: A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling
Journal of Management, October 1, 2001; 27(5): 515 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]