Journal of Management

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript electronically

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Phan, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, 541-559 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300403

Explaining the Assigned Goal-Incentive Interaction: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Personal Goals

Thomas W. Lee

University of Washington, ORCAS{at}U.WASHINGTON.EDU

Edwin A. Locke

University of Maryland

Soo H. Phan

University of Washington

This study was designed to replicate conceptually and to explain the goal-level vs. incentive-type interaction reported by Mowen, Middlemist, and Luther (1981) based on goal setting and social cognitive theories. Mowen et al. found that subjects performed more poorly with hard goals than medium goals under a bonus pay system, the opposite of what was found for a piece-rate system. In the present study, an hourly pay condition was added. Mowen et al.‘s interaction was replicated using a two-trial design in which subjects could obtain feedback about their ability to attain the incentive bonuses between trials. The experimental effects were completely mediated by personal goals and self-efficacy. Goal commitment was related to performance, but did not mediate the experimental conditions. The implications for the design of incentive systems are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. P. Guthrie and E. C. Hollensbe
Group Incentives and Performance: A Study of Spontaneous Goal Setting, Goal Choice and Commitment
Journal of Management, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 263 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
M. London and T. Diamante
Technology-Focused Expansive Professionals: Developing Continuous Learning in the High-Technology Sector
Human Resource Development Review, December 1, 2002; 1(4): 500 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
F. M. Moussa
Determinants, Process, and Consequences of Personal Goals and Performance
Journal of Management, December 1, 2000; 26(6): 1259 - 1285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. L. Ambrose and C. T. Kulik
Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s
Journal of Management, June 1, 1999; 25(3): 231 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]