This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (60) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Amason, A. C. Articles by Sapienza, H. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict

University of Georgia

Harry J. Sapienza

University of South Carolina

There is mounting evidence that effective top management teams engage in cognitive conflict but limit affective conflict. Cognitive conflict is task-oriented disagreement arising from differences in perspective. Affective conflict is individual-oriented disagreement arising from personal disaffection. This study of 48 TMTs found that team size and openness were positively related to cognitive conflict. While team size was also associated with greater affective conflict, when teams had high levels of mutuality, greater openness led to less affective conflict. The findings have implications for improving strategic decision making through the use of conflict.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. B. Ayoko, V. J. Callan, and C. E. J. Hartel The Influence of Team Emotional Intelligence Climate on Conflict and Team Members' Reactions to Conflict Small Group Research, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 121 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. P. Hodgkinson and M. P. Healey Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning Organization Studies, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 435 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Hutzschenreuter and I. Kleindienst Strategy-Process Research: What Have We Learned and What Is Still to Be Explored Journal of Management, October 1, 2006; 32(5): 673 - 720. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Kotlyar and L. Karakowsky Leading Conflict? Linkages Between Leader Behaviors and Group Conflict Small Group Research, August 1, 2006; 37(4): 377 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. K. W. De Dreu When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams Journal of Management, February 1, 2006; 32(1): 83 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Carpenter, M. A. Geletkanycz, and Wm. G. Sanders Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 749 - 778. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Tjosvold and M. Poon Dealing with Scarce Resources: Open-Minded Interaction for Resolving Budget Conflicts Group Organization Management, September 1, 1998; 23(3): 237 - 255. [Abstract]