Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snell, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Youndt, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Testing a Contingency Model of Executive Controls

Scott A. Snell

The Pennsylvania State University

Mark A. Youndt

The Pennsylvania State University

This study examined the relationship between human resource management (HRM) controls used by executives and changes in the financial performance of their firms (ROA and sales growth). Results from 102 single product firms indicate that, as hypothesized, when the approach to HRM was based on behavior control, firm performance was higher when executives had complete knowledge of cause-effect relations. HRM based on output control had neither a direct nor a moderating effect on firm performance. When the approach to HRM was based on input control, performance was higher when standards of desirability were ambiguous. From a practical standpoint, these findings suggest that executives should be cognizant of several contingencies that might guide their choice among various approaches to HRM, as well as the effects these choices have on the performance of their firms. From a research standpoint, there are several issues raised in this study that suggest avenues for future investigation on HRM, control, and performance.

Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, 711-737 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639502100407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
M. Harvey, C. Speier, and M. M. Novicevic
The Evolution of Strategic Human Resource Systems and their Application in a Foreign Subsidiary Context
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 1, 2002; 40(3): 284 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. P. Lepak and S. A. Snell
Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations
Journal of Management, August 1, 2002; 28(4): 517 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. Miller and J. Lee
The people make the process: commitment to employees, decision making, and performance
Journal of Management, April 1, 2001; 27(2): 163 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
A. Neal and M. A. Griffin
Developing a Model of Individual Performance for Human Resource Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, January 1, 1999; 37(2): 44 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]