|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?
Christine M. Riordan
Georgia State University, MGTCMRX{at}GSUVMI.GSU.EDU
Robert J. Vandenberg
The University of Georgia
Within the present research, a covariance structure analytic procedure is applied to test the stability and transferability of organizational measures between groups in cross-cultural research. Findings support the need to establish the equivalency of constructs and measures prior to interpreting differences in means of self-report variables between culturally diverse groups. Indeed, for two measures, the cultural groups were using different conceptual frames of reference when responding to the items. For a third measure, the groups were calibrating the true scores differently. However, the source of the calibration difference was identified and subsequently accounted for in later analyses. Thus, differences between latent means for the culturally diverse groups were calculated and interpreted. The approach outlined in this paper is proffered as yielding valuable insights regarding the appropriateness of comparative cross-cultural studies.
Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 3,
643-671 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639402000307

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim
Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory.,
October 1, 2009;
19(4):
839 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. H. Ng, K. L. Sorensen, and F. H. K. Yim
Does the Job Satisfaction--Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 2009;
40(5):
761 - 796.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gregg, D. L. Bandalos, C. Coleman, J. M. Davis, K. Robinson, and J. Blake
The Validity of a Battery of Phonemic and Orthographic Awareness Tasks for Adults With and Without Dyslexia and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Remedial and Special Education,
June 1, 2008;
29(3):
175 - 190.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Lievens, F. Anseel, M. M. Harris, and J. Eisenberg
Measurement Invariance of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire Across Three Countries
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
December 1, 2007;
67(6):
1042 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Meade, G. J. Lautenschlager, and E. C. Johnson
A Monte Carlo Examination of the Sensitivity of the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework for Tests of Measurement Invariance With Likert Data
Applied Psychological Measurement,
September 1, 2007;
31(5):
430 - 455.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Mueller, C. Liebig, and K. Hattrup
Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys: An Investigation of the Measurement Equivalence of a Multifaceted Job Satisfaction Measure
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2007;
67(4):
658 - 678.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Tsui, S. S. Nifadkar, and Amy Yi Ou
Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations
Journal of Management,
June 1, 2007;
33(3):
426 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Meade, L. C. Michels, and G. J. Lautenschlager
Are Internet and Paper-and-Pencil Personality Tests Truly Comparable?: An Experimental Design Measurement Invariance Study
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2007;
10(2):
322 - 345.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Cole, A. G. Bedeian, and H. S. Feild
The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership: A Multinational Test
Organizational Research Methods,
July 1, 2006;
9(3):
339 - 368.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Meade and C. M. Kroustalis
Problems With Item Parceling for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Invariance
Organizational Research Methods,
July 1, 2006;
9(3):
369 - 403.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. J. Ong and C. Ward
The Construction and Validation of a Social Support Measure for Sojourners: The Index of Sojourner Social Support (ISSS) Scale
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
November 1, 2005;
36(6):
637 - 661.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kraiger
Book Review: Ordinal Measurement in the Behavioral Sciences
Organizational Research Methods,
October 1, 2005;
8(4):
475 - 480.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Posthuma, J. R.W. Joplin, and C. P. Maertz Jr
Comparing the Validity of Turnover Predictors in the United States and Mexico
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
August 1, 2005;
5(2):
165 - 180.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Pellegrini and T. A. Scandura
Construct Equivalence across Groups: An Unexplored Issue in Mentoring Research
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
April 1, 2005;
65(2):
323 - 335.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Johnson, P. Kulesa, I. Llc, Y. I. Cho, and S. Shavitt
The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles: Evidence From 19 Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2005;
36(2):
264 - 277.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Cheung, K. F. Murrmann, S. K. Murrmann, and C. Becker
Noninvariant Measurement Versus Traditional Approaches for Studying Cultural Differences: A Case of Service Expectations
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research,
November 1, 2004;
28(4):
375 - 390.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Meade and G. J. Lautenschlager
A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Methodologies for Establishing Measurement Equivalence/Invariance
Organizational Research Methods,
October 1, 2004;
7(4):
361 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Pierce and D. G. Gardner
Self-Esteem Within the Work and Organizational Context: A Review of the Organization-Based Self-Esteem Literature
Journal of Management,
October 1, 2004;
30(5):
591 - 622.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Arce-Ferrer and J. J. Ketterer
The Effect of Scale Tailoring for Cross-Cultural Application on Scale Reliability and Construct Validity
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 2003;
63(3):
484 - 501.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Schaffer and C. M. Riordan
A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2003;
6(2):
169 - 215.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Penny
Exploring Differential Item Functioning in a 360-Degree Assessment: Rater Source and Method of Delivery
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2003;
6(1):
61 - 79.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Koslowsky, A. Sagie, and S. Stashevsky
Introduction: Cultural Relativism and Universalism in Organizational Behaviors
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
August 1, 2002;
2(2):
131 - 135.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Reisinger and L. W. Turner
Cultural Differences between Asian Tourist Markets and Australian Hosts: Part 2
Journal of Travel Research,
May 1, 2002;
40(4):
385 - 395.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Vandenberg
Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2002;
5(2):
139 - 158.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Vandenberghe, F. Stinglhamber, K. Bentein, and T. Delhaise
An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Validity of a Multidimensional Model of Commitment in Europe
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
May 1, 2001;
32(3):
322 - 347.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2000;
31(2):
187 - 212.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Clugston, J. P. Howell, and P. W. Dorfman
Does Cultural Socialization Predict Multiple Bases and Foci of Commitment?
Journal of Management,
February 1, 2000;
26(1):
5 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Vandenberg and C. E. Lance
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2000;
3(1):
4 - 70.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Aryee, D. Fields, and V. Luk
A Cross-Cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface
Journal of Management,
August 1, 1999;
25(4):
491 - 511.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Mueller, R. D. Iverson, and D.-G. Jo
Distributive Justice Evaluations in Two Cultural Contexts: A Comparison of U.S. and South Korean Teachers
Human Relations,
July 1, 1999;
52(7):
869 - 893.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method
Journal of Management,
February 1, 1999;
25(1):
1 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Rensvold and G. W. Cheung
Testing Measurement Models for Factorial Invariance: A Systematic Approach
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
December 1, 1998;
58(6):
1017 - 1034.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Forst and W. E. K. Lehman
Ethnic Differences in the Workplace Environment by Employees in Two Municipal Workforces
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,
February 1, 1997;
19(1):
84 - 96.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|