|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications
Robert D. Bretz, Jr.
George T. Milkovich
Cornell University
Walter Read
Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield
On the surface, it is not readily apparent how some performance appraisal research issues inform performance appraisal practice. Because performance appraisal is an applied topic, it is useful to periodically consider the current state of performance research and its relation to performance appraisal practice. This review examines the performance appraisal literature published in both academic and practitioner outlets between 1985 and 1990, briefly discusses the current state of performance appraisal practice, highlights the juxtaposition of research and practice, and suggests directions for further research.
Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 2,
321-352 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/014920639201800206
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. J. Schleicher, R. A. Bull, and S. G. Green
Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems
Journal of Management,
August 1, 2009;
35(4):
899 - 927.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Kimball and A. Milanowski
Examining Teacher Evaluation Validity and Leadership Decision Making Within a Standards-Based Evaluation System
Educational Administration Quarterly,
February 1, 2009;
45(1):
34 - 70.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Gordon and L. P. Stewart
Conversing About Performance: Discursive Resources for the Appraisal Interview
Management Communication Quarterly,
February 1, 2009;
22(3):
473 - 501.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Tepper, M. Uhl-Bien, G. F. Kohut, S. G. Rogelberg, D. E. Lockhart, and M. D. Ensley
Subordinates' Resistance and Managers' Evaluations of Subordinates' Performance
Journal of Management,
April 1, 2006;
32(2):
185 - 209.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. May and L. E. Gueldenzoph
The Effect of Social Style on Peer Evaluation Ratings in Project Teams
Journal of Business Communication,
January 1, 2006;
43(1):
4 - 20.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Jawahar
Do Raters Consider the Influence of Situational Factors on Observed Performance When Evaluating Performance? Evidence From Three Experiments
Group Organization Management,
February 1, 2005;
30(1):
6 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E. Levy and J. R. Williams
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future
Journal of Management,
December 1, 2004;
30(6):
881 - 905.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Woehr and W. Arthur Jr.
The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors
Journal of Management,
April 1, 2003;
29(2):
231 - 258.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Moorman and D. L. Wells
Can Electronic Performance Monitoring Be Fair? Exploring Relationships Among Monitoring Characteristics, Perceived Fairness, and Job Performance
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
January 1, 2003;
10(2):
2 - 16.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Waldman and L. E. Atwater
Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of an Upward Feedback Process
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 2001;
26(2):
189 - 205.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Erdogan, M. L. Kraimer, and R. C. Liden
Procedural Justice as a Two-Dimensional Construct: An Examination in the Performance Appraisal Context
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
June 1, 2001;
37(2):
205 - 222.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Balser and R. N. Stern
Resistance and Cooperation: A Response to Conflict Over Job Performance
Human Relations,
August 1, 1999;
52(8):
1029 - 1053.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Blau
Testing the Longitudinal Impact of Work Variables and Performance Appraisal Satisfaction on Subsequent Overall Job Satisfaction
Human Relations,
August 1, 1999;
52(8):
1099 - 1113.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Ramamoorthy and S. J. Carroll
Individualism/Collectivism Orientations and Reactions Toward Alternative Human Resource Management Practices
Human Relations,
May 1, 1998;
51(5):
571 - 588.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Waldman
Predictors of Employee Preferences for Multirater and Group-Based Performance Appraisal
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 1997;
22(2):
264 - 287.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. E. Roberts and T. Reed
Performance Appraisal Participation, Goal Setting and Feedback: The Influence of Supervisory Style
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
October 1, 1996;
16(4):
29 - 60.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Tharenou
The Impact of a Developmental Performance Appraisal Program on Employee Perceptions in an Australian Federal Agency
Group Organization Management,
September 1, 1995;
20(3):
245 - 271.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Harris
Rater Motivation in the Performance Appraisal Context: A Theoretical Framework
Journal of Management,
August 1, 1994;
20(4):
735 - 756.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Villanova, H. J. Bernardin, S. A. Dahmus, and R. L. Sims
Rater Leniency and Performance Appraisal Discomfort
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
September 1, 1993;
53(3):
789 - 799.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
