This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schnake, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Equity in Effort: The "Sucker Effect" in Co-Acting Groups

Valdosta State College

This research investigates the effects of negative social cues on worker quantitative task performance, internal work motivation, and job satisfaction. Negative social cues may create an effect similar to a class of social dilemma phenomena in small groups known as the "sucker effect." The sucker effect was originally identified as a particular form of social loafing and stems from the perceptions that others in the group are withholding, or intend to withhold, effort. Individuals who hold this perception then withhold effort themselves to avoid being played for a "sucker" Although most social loafing research has examined the sucker effect in situations where individuals performed additive or disjunctive tasks, this experimental research investigates the degree to which the sucker effect occurs among individuals working in co-acting groups. Two common managerial strategies, goal setting and punishment, are examinedfor their ability to reduce the sucker effect. The results show that the sucker effect does occur in co-acting groups and that both punishment and goal setting may be used to reduce it. Further, goal setting was a more effective strategy than punishment.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Mulder, E. van Dijk, D. De Cremer, and H. A. M. Wilke When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: considering the presence of an alternative option to defect. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 1312 - 1324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, R. A. Jaworski, and N. Bennett Social Loafing: A Field Investigation Journal of Management, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 285 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Mason and M. A. Griffin Grouptask Satisfaction: Applying the Construct of Job Satisfaction to Groups Small Group Research, June 1, 2002; 33(3): 271 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Bennett and R. E. Kidwell Jr. The Provision of Effort in Self-Designing Work Groups: The Case of Collaborative Research Small Group Research, December 1, 2001; 32(6): 727 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Ambrose and C. T. Kulik Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s Journal of Management, June 1, 1999; 25(3): 231 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. W. Mulvey, L. Bowes-Sperry, and H. J. Klein The Effects of Perceived Loafing and Defensive Impression Management on Group Effectiveness Small Group Research, June 1, 1998; 29(3): 394 - 415. [Abstract]

				D. R. Comer A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups Human Relations, June 1, 1995; 48(6): 647 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]