Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beatty, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Beatty, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Policy-Capturing Approach to the Study of United States and Japanese Managers' Compensation Decisions

James R. Beatty

San Diego State University

Joseph T. McCune

Richard W. Beatty

Rutgers University

Although there is much interest in the implementation of Japanese management techniques in the United States, it is not clear which aspects can be successfully adopted here. The present study examined the compensation decision-making policies of 41 Japanese and 63 United States managers. The results confi rmed past research regarding the importance that U.S. managers place upon job performance in their pay decisions and the importance that Japanese managers place upon other factors beyond performance (e.g., job worth) in their decisions. In addition, both groups gave the same amount of pay increase on the average; however, U.S. managers were much more willing to give large or small increases, whereas the Japanese managers had little variance in pay increases from employee to employee. Implications for managerial policy and practices of Japanese managers operating in the United States are discussed.

Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, 465-474 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638801400309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. F.T. Chiang and T. Birtch
The transferability of management practices: Examining cross-national differences in reward preferences
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1293 - 1330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. J. Karren and M. W. Barringer
A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and Practice
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 337 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
P. C. Earley and C. B. Gibson
Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community
Journal of Management, June 1, 1998; 24(3): 265 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. B. Keys, L. T. Denton, and T. R. Miller
The Japanese Management Theory Jungle-Revisited
Journal of Management, April 1, 1994; 20(2): 373 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. A. Ricks, B. Toyne, and Z. Martinez
Recent Developments in International Management Research
Journal of Management, June 1, 1990; 16(2): 219 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]