Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mossholder, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Feild, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Job Performance and Turnover Decisions: Two Field Studies

Kevin W. Mossholder

Auburn University

Arthur G. Bedeian

Louisiana State University

Dwight R. Norris

William F. Giles

Hubert S. Feild

Auburn University

Hypotheses involving relationships between job performance and turnover decisions were tested in two settings within the context of an integrated model. In an initial test with a sample of manufacturing operatives, support was foundfor (a) a curvilinear relationship between performance and turnover intentions, and (b) a satisfaction X performance interaction in predicting such intentions. A second test of the same hypotheses, using actual turnover as a criterion, was conducted for first-line manufacturing supervisors. Only the curvilinear hypothesis received support.

Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, 403-414 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638801400304
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
V. Van Steenberg LaFarge
The Ambivalence of Departing Employees: Reactions of Involuntary and Voluntary Exiters
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 1994; 30(2): 175 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
G. H. Lucas JR, E. Babakus, and T. N. Ingram
An Empirical Test of the Job Satisfaction-Turnover Relationship: Assessing the Role of Job Performance for Retail Managers
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, June 1, 1990; 18(3): 199 - 208.
[Abstract]