Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freedman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Changing Nature of Research on Women at Work

Sara M. Freedman

James S. Phillips

University of Houston

A thematic review of the recent literature on women at work indicates that women continue to fair more poorly than men in organizational reward decisions. Otherwise, gender related differences are more prevalent than actual sex differences in many research contexts. These differences are, however, inconsistent across studies. Our evaluation of the most recent research on women at work suggests that more emphasis on information processing models for explaining gender relevant attitudes and behavior might not only resolve some of the inconsistencies, but also provide valuable new insights into the variability that exists among women. Each of these advances could significantly improve our understanding of the role of women in modern organizational life.

Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 231-251 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638801400206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
K. M. Hopkins
Interactions of Gender and Race in Workers' Help Seeking for Personal/Family Problems: Perceptions of Supervisor Support and Intervention
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2002; 38(2): 156 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
J. GRANT
Women Managers and the Gendered Construction of Personal Relationships
Journal of Family Issues, November 1, 2000; 21(8): 963 - 985.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. M. Konrad, E. Corrigall, P. Lieb, and J. E. Ritchie JR.
Sex Differences in Job Attribute Preferences among Managers and Business Students
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2000; 25(2): 108 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. Dickerson and M. A. Taylor
Self-Limiting Behavior in Women: Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy as Predictors
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2000; 25(2): 191 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Lubatkin and G. Powell
Exploring the Influence of Gender on Managerial Work in a Thansitional, Eastern European Nation
Human Relations, August 1, 1998; 51(8): 1007 - 1031.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
E. W. Miles and W. C. King JR.
Gender and Administration Mode Effects when Pencil-And-Paper Personality Tests are Computerized
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1998; 58(1): 68 - 76.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
L. E. Atwater and D. D. Van Fleet
A Nother Ceiling? Can Males Compete for Traditionally Female Jobs?
Journal of Management, October 1, 1997; 23(5): 603 - 626.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Truss, R. Goffee, and G. Jones
Segregated Occupations and Gender Stereotyping: A Study of Secretarial Work in Europe
Human Relations, November 1, 1995; 48(11): 1331 - 1354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
W. L. Gardner III, J. Van Eck Peluchette, and S. K. Clinebell
Valuing Women in Management: An Impression Management Perspective of Gender Diversity
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1994; 8(2): 115 - 164.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
R. W. GRIFFETH, K. D. CARSON, P. P. CARSON, J. RAGAN, and V. WAN-HUGGINS
The Effects of Gender and Employee Classification Level on Communication-Related Outcomes: A Test of Structuralist and Socialization Hypotheses
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 1994; 8(3): 299 - 318.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. R. Ragins and J. L. Cotton
Gender and Willingness to Mentor in Organizations
Journal of Management, February 1, 1993; 19(1): 97 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
T. L. Robbins and A. S. DeNisi
Moderators of Sex Bias in the Performance Appraisal Process: A Cognitive Analysis
Journal of Management, February 1, 1993; 19(1): 113 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
U. E. Gattiker
Computer Skills Acquisition: A Review and Future Directions for Research
Journal of Management, September 1, 1992; 18(3): 547 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
T. R. Lituchy and W. J. Wiswall
The Role of Masculine and Feminine Speech Patterns in Proposal Acceptance: A Laboratory Study
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 1991; 4(4): 450 - 465.
[Abstract]