Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keim, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baysinger, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Efficacy of Business Political Activity: Competitive Considerations in a Principal-Agent Context

Gerald Keim

Barry Baysinger

Texas A&M University

This paper attempts to specify some conditions affecting the efficacy of business efforts to influence political decision making in legislatures and regulatory agencies. Two streams of literature are integrated to provide a model of political decision making from political economy and to draw on the strategic management literature to facilitate consideration of the implications of competition in the market to influence political decisions.

"In short, the overall policy impact of business political activity remains debatable, and the desirable mode and level of corporate political influence... remains undefined.

New research on business and politics should involve something more than the accumulation of additional case studies; these are the raw materials for serious analysis, but not the final product. The significant studies will be those that specify more clearly the conditions under which political activity of different types and levels produces (or fails to produce) different kinds of effects."

Preston, 1986

Given the structure of the American political economy, business organizations rank high among our most important political institutions and are... inevitable participants in the political process. The more we understand of the political structure, operations and objectives of these organizations and those who run them, the more insightful we can be concerning the actual conditions of political democracy in the United States. [However]... honest disagreement aplenty exists... concerning whether "Big Business"... poses a real or chimerical, a present or future, an active or passive threat to American democracy.

Epstein, 1980

Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 163-180 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638801400203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
M. Hadani
Family Matters: Founding Family Firms and Corporate Political Activity
Business Society, December 1, 2007; 46(4): 395 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. J. Hillman, G. D. Keim, and D. Schuler
Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 837 - 857.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
A. J. Hillman
Determinants of Political Strategies in U.S. Multinationals
Business Society, December 1, 2003; 42(4): 455 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. A. Clougherty
Nonmarket Strategy for Merger Reviews: The Roles of Institutional Independence and International Competitive Effects
Business Society, March 1, 2003; 42(1): 115 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
B. Shaffer, T. J. Quasney, and C. M. Grimm
Firm Level Performance Implications of Nonmarket Actions
Business Society, June 1, 2000; 39(2): 126 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
R. G. Cook and D. R. Fox
Resources, Frequency, and Methods: An Analysis of Small and Medium-Sized Firms' Public Policy Activities
Business Society, March 1, 2000; 39(1): 94 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
K. A. Rehbein and D. A. Schuler
Testing the Firm as a Filter of Corporate Political Action
Business Society, June 1, 1999; 38(2): 144 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
V. L. Rosenberg, P. C. Kelley, and R. D. Kidder
A Nonidealist's Guide to Dispute Resolution
Business Society, June 1, 1998; 37(2): 184 - 220.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
D. A. Schuler and K. Rehbein
The Filtering Role of the Firm in Corporate Political Involvement
Business Society, June 1, 1997; 36(2): 116 - 139.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
C. B. Mullery, S. N. Brenner, and N. A. Perrin
A Structural Analysis of Corporate Political Activity: An Application of MDS to the Study of Intercorporate Relations
Business Society, August 1, 1995; 34(2): 147 - 170.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. Shaffer
Firm-level Responses to Government Regulation: Theoretical and Research Approaches
Journal of Management, June 1, 1995; 21(3): 495 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. A. Lenway, C. K. Jacobson, and J. Goldstein
To Lobby or to Petition: The Political Environment of U.S. Trade Policy
Journal of Management, March 1, 1990; 16(1): 119 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]