Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erez, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Congruence of Goal-Setting Strategies With Socio-Cultural Values and its Effect on Performance

Miriam Erez

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel

The congruence between goal-setting strategies and socio-cultural values of the working environment was investigated in this study. A 3 x 3 factorial design was used to compare kibbutz, public (Histadrut), and private sectors with respect to the goal-setting strategies of group participation, participation by representation, and no participation. Subjects were 135 first-level supervisors who evaluated forms of task descriptions filled out by their subordinates. Performance was measured by the number of descriptions checked by the supervisors. Results indicated that in the private sector, the most effective strategy was assigned goals; in the public sector, participation by representation; and in the kibbutz, group participation. The implications of thesefindings for participation in goal setting and decision making are discussed.

Journal of Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, 585-592 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638601200413


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. Sagie and Z. Aycan
A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Participative Decision-Making in Organizations
Human Relations, April 1, 2003; 56(4): 453 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
B. R. Agle and C. B. Caldwell
Understanding Research on Values in Business: A Level of Analysis Framework
Business Society, September 1, 1999; 38(3): 326 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
A. Sagie
Participative Decision Making and Performance: A Moderator Analysis
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 1994; 30(2): 227 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]