Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aupperle, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Booth, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Empirical Critique of In Search of Excellence: How Excellent are the Excellent Companies?

Kenneth E. Aupperle

The University of Akron

William Acar

David E. Booth

Kent State University

This article examines the research methods used by Peters and Waterman in their book, In Search of Excellence (1982), and describes the results of empirical tests done to assess whether their exemplary firms are actually excellent. Peters and Waterman's "excellent" firms were compared with 1,000firms evaluated by Forbes in its annual report on American industry. Four measures offinancial performance were used: return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), market valuation, and sales growth. A series of difference-of-means tests and direct tests were used to analyze the data. Results indicate that the excellent firms are not as superior as Peters and Waterman have suggested. The implications of these findings for culturelperformance research are discussed.

Journal of Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, 499-512 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/014920638601200405
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
P. J. Richard, T. M. Devinney, G. S. Yip, and G. Johnson
Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice
Journal of Management, June 1, 2009; 35(3): 718 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
S. Kaplan
The Seduction of Best Practice: Commentary on "Taking Strategy Seriously"
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2003; 12(4): 410 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
D. V. Day and R. G. Lord
Executive Leadership and Organizational Performance: Suggestions for a New Theory and Methodology
Journal of Management, September 1, 1988; 14(3): 453 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]