Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0149206308330560v1
35/3/718    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice

Pierre J. Richard*, Timothy M. Devinney, George S. Yip, and Gerry Johnson

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pierrer{at}agsm.edu.au.


   Abstract
Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research. Reviewing past studies reveals a multidimensional conceptualization of organizational performance related predominately to stakeholders, heterogeneous product market circumstances, and time. A review of the operationalization of performance highlights the limited effectiveness of commonly accepted measurement practices in tapping this multidimensionality. Addressing these findings requires researchers to (a) possess a strong theoretical rationale on the nature of performance (i.e., theory establishing which measures are appropriate to the research context) and (b) rely on strong theory as to the nature of measures (i.e., theory establishing which measures should be combined and the method for doing so). All management research on performance should explicitly address these two requirements. The authors conclude with a call for research that examines triangulation using multiple measures, longitudinal data and alternative methodological formulations as methods of appropriately aligning research contexts with the measurement of organizational performance.

First published on February 6, 2009, doi:10.1177/0149206308330560

Journal of Management 2009;35:718.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. Cropanzano
Writing Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions
Journal of Management, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 1304 - 1311.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. T. Certo, T. R. Holcomb, and R. M. Holmes Jr
IPO Research in Management and Entrepreneurship: Moving the Agenda Forward
Journal of Management, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 1340 - 1378.
[Abstract] [PDF]