This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pazy, A. Articles by Ganzach, Y. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Pay Contingency and the Effects of Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support on Performance and Commitment

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: asyap{at}post.tau.ac.il.

	Abstract

Applying a social exchange perspective, three studies examine how the effects of perceived organizational support (POS) and perceived supervisor support (PSS) on performance and commitment are constrained by pay contingency. Study 1 shows a negative interaction between POS and pay contingency and a positive interaction between PSS and pay contingency in their effects on performance and nonsignificant interactions regarding commitment. In Studies 2 and 3, which were conducted in high pay contingency field settings, performance was affected by PSS but not by POS, whereas commitment was affected by POS but not by PSS. Implications of these moderation effects are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?